Why IDNs are looking to Alternate-Source Suppliers to ensure they never lose access to critical products

For years, the supply chain side of the healthcare industry has been focused on vendor consolidation, inventory reduction, and improved efficiency; always operating under the belief that “less is more.”

In an era of dramatic changes in the industry, this was by and large, a good strategy and served to reduce overall costs – to both the health systems and to patients – without impacting the quality of care. 

The pandemic was a wake-up call to supply chain and the hardship created by supply disruptions has caused providers to reevaluate their priorities, vendor relationships, and product marketplace options.

As the industry works correct the systemic flaws exposed by the pandemic, the sourcing model will change to support it. The healthcare supply chain of the future will be an efficient but diversified sourcing model.

Being forced to get out of their comfort zone and supplier bubble allowed many IDNs to discover new reliable sources that they hadn’t considered before. As a result, providers are now starting to really think about incorporating those new alternate sources as part of their long-term strategy going forward in order to “de-risk” the supply chain.

In order to de-risk supply chain while also gaining access to multiple sources, a move that makes a lot of sense is shifting to a digital marketplace model for some product areas. The digital marketplace structure is a fast growing model that’s already taken hold outside of the healthcare industry – supply chains of all industries are increasingly turning toward an online marketplace model.

Digital Commerce 360, a leading media and research organization, estimates that the explosive growth of B-to-B digital marketplaces across business sectors may reach $3.6 trillion globally by 2024. Not surprisingly, the healthcare medical products supply chain possesses many of the key characteristics they cite for successful marketplace growth.     

Currently, our industry wrongly believes that contract pricing is what keeps efficiency high and costs low. Unfortunately, during the crisis of the last year, patients and their families paid the price for that misbelief.

Additionally, if there’s one thing that major IDNs have made clear over the last year, its that having multiple sources is now an imperative.

On top of that, providers are also calling for solutions that create a better way to move supplies between facilities during a time of supply disruption.

Currently, many manufactures restrict product from moving between hospitals. Right now there is an estimated $25 billion in purchases that is sitting unconsumed. These policies can create artificial scarcity while at the same time generating huge monetary and material waste for the healthcare system as a whole.

There is a better way. A marketplace model provides transparency, simplifies transactions, and allows providers to nullify the high risk of product shortages that comes with single-source supply contracts. And as we’ve seen over the last year, in times of crisis, that risk reduction is more precious than gold.

The Journal of Healthcare Contracting

Clearlake-Backed symplr To Acquire Phynd

SANTA MONICA, Calif. and HOUSTON, Jan. 25, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — symplr, a leading global healthcare governance, risk management, and compliance (“GRC”) software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) platform, backed by Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. (together with its affiliates, “Clearlake”) and SkyKnight Capital (together with its affiliates, “SkyKnight”), today announced that it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Phynd Technologies (“Phynd” or the “Company”). The acquisition further strengthens symplr as a global healthcare GRC leader by adding Phynd’s leading provider directory management SaaS platform. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.

The combination of symplr and Phynd expands the healthcare industry’s leading end-to-end GRC platform of scale by enhancing symplr’s provider data management offering to enable management of a provider’s profile, location, clinical expertise, health plan and network participation, and programs. symplr’s provider data management SaaS platform will now offer hospitals, health systems, and health plans an industry-leading pathway for leveraging symplr’s credentialing and privileging data in several patient-facing applications, including provider directory, provider search, digital front door, and provider scheduling.

Growth through acquisition, coupled with organic expansion and product innovation, is an integral part of symplr’s business strategy to deliver the industry’s leading healthcare GRC SaaS platform. The acquisition of Phynd represents symplr’s eleventh acquisition in the past six years, and its sixth under sponsorship from Clearlake and SkyKnight since November 2018.

“We’re very excited to welcome Phynd to the symplr family,” said BJ Schaknowski, CEO of symplr. “Their SaaS solutions will integrate with our provider software solutions to create an unmatched end-to-end provider data management platform for hospitals, health systems, and payers. This addition will deliver unparalleled value to our customers.”

“We look forward to joining the symplr team,” said Tom White, CEO of Phynd. “symplr’s leading GRC SaaS platform, further enhanced by Phynd’s deep provider data management, provider search, and integration capabilities, will extend the Company’s impact across the healthcare landscape, enhancing consumer experiences, clinical operations, health plan and network management, and revenue cycle operations.”

“This is an impressive milestone for symplr as the acquisition of Phynd provides highly complementary cloud provider directory management technology, expanding the company’s capabilities and addressable market,” said Behdad Eghbali, Co-Founder and Managing Partner, and Prashant Mehrotra, Partner, of Clearlake. “The combination of both platforms further establishes symplr as the healthcare GRC software leader, and we look forward to supporting the symplr management team as they drive consolidation in the industry and accelerate organic growth.”

“We are excited to support symplr in its acquisition of Phynd,” said Claude Burton, Partner, and Jordan Milich, Principal, of SkyKnight. “The acquisition enhances symplr’s offerings and is an exciting step toward delivering an even more comprehensive end-to-end healthcare GRC SaaS platform.”

Harris Williams and Healthcare Growth Partners served as financial advisors to symplr.

About symplr

As the global leader in healthcare governance, risk management, and compliance software, symplr has a single mission: to make healthcare GRC simpler, resulting in improved efficiency, better outcomes, and safer patients. symplr customers depend on our provider data management, workforce management, contract management, spend management, compliance, quality, safety, and facility access solutions to drive positive outcomes and to protect their patients and staff. More information is available at www.symplr.com.

About Clearlake Capital

Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. is a leading investment firm founded in 2006 operating integrated businesses across private equity, credit and other related strategies. With a sector-focused approach, the firm seeks to partner with world-class management teams by providing patient, long-term capital to dynamic businesses that can benefit from Clearlake’s operational improvement approach, O.P.S.® The firm’s core target sectors are technology, industrials and consumer. Clearlake currently has approximately $25 billion of assets under management and its senior investment principals have led or co-led over 200 investments. The firm has offices in Santa Monica and Dallas. More information is available at www.clearlake.com and on Twitter @ClearlakeCap.

About SkyKnight Capital    

Founded in 2015, SkyKnight Capital manages over $1.5 billion in private equity capital on behalf of leading institutional family offices, foundations, and endowments. SkyKnight makes long-term investments into high quality businesses in acyclical growth sectors alongside exceptional management teams. SkyKnight aims to build category-leading businesses with a clear growth orientation in healthcare, insurance, and business services. More information is available at www.skyknightcapital.com.

Media Contact
Lambert & Co.
Jennifer Hurson
845-507-0571
jhurson@lambert.com

SOURCE symplr

Pfizer Will Ship Fewer Vaccine Vials to Account for ‘Extra’ Doses

By Noah WeilandKatie Thomas and Sharon LaFraniere

Jan. 22, 2021

In December, pharmacists made the happy discovery that they could squeeze an extra vaccine dose out of Pfizer vials that were supposed to contain only five.

Now, it appears, the bill is due. Pfizer plans to count the surprise sixth dose toward its previous commitment of 200 million doses of Covid vaccine by the end of July and therefore will be providing fewer vials than once expected for the United States.

And yet, pharmacists at some vaccination sites say they are still struggling to reliably extract the extra doses, which require the use of a specialty syringe.

“Now there’s more pressure to make sure that you get that sixth dose out,” said Michael Ganio, the senior director for pharmacy practice and quality at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

For weeks, Pfizer executives pushed officials at the Food and Drug Administration to change the wording of the vaccine’s so-called emergency use authorization so that it formally acknowledged that the vials contained six doses, not five.

The distinction was critical: Pfizer’s contract with the federal government requires that it be paid by the dose. And there were serious public health implications. If the label’s formal language told people administering the vaccine that the vial contained a sixth dose, that could accelerate the pace of vaccinations at a crucial time.

At one point, Pfizer executives lashed out at the top federal vaccine regulator over the government’s hesitation to approve the request, according to people familiar with the discussions who were not authorized to discuss them.

On Jan. 6, Pfizer got what it wanted. The F.D.A. changed the language in its fact sheet for doctors to confirm that the vials contain a sixth dose. The change mirrored similar labeling updates by the World Health Organization and the F.D.A.’s counterpart in the European Union.

Company officials, including the chief executive, Dr. Albert Bourla, have said that the sixth dose allows Pfizer to stretch its supply of scarce vaccine even further — it was one factor, for example, in the company’s new estimates that it will be able to manufacture two billion doses for the world this year, instead of the 1.3 billion it had originally planned.

A Pfizer spokeswoman, Amy Rose, said the company would “fulfill our supply commitments in line with our existing agreements — which are based on delivery of doses, not vials.”

When Pfizer first began shipping the vaccines in mid-December, it said that each vial contained enough liquid for five doses. But pharmacists in hospitals across the country soon noticed that the vials held enough for a sixth — and sometimes a seventh — dose. The discovery prompted a flurry of excitement and confusion, with some pharmacists throwing out the extra vaccine because they did not have permission to use it.

But they were soon advised by the F.D.A. that they could use those extra doses, which could be extracted with a so-called low dead volume syringe that is designed to cut down on wasted medication and vaccines.

Suddenly, it seemed as if the 100 million doses of vaccine that Pfizer has promised to the United States by the end of March would stretch to as much as 120 million — a welcome development given the scarcity of Covid-19 vaccines and the coronavirus pandemic’s mounting death toll.

A Pfizer spokeswoman, Amy Rose, said the company would “fulfill our supply commitments in line with our existing agreements — which are based on delivery of doses, not vials.”

When Pfizer first began shipping the vaccines in mid-December, it said that each vial contained enough liquid for five doses. But pharmacists in hospitals across the country soon noticed that the vials held enough for a sixth — and sometimes a seventh — dose. The discovery prompted a flurry of excitement and confusion, with some pharmacists throwing out the extra vaccine because they did not have permission to use it.

But they were soon advised by the F.D.A. that they could use those extra doses, which could be extracted with a so-called low dead volume syringe that is designed to cut down on wasted medication and vaccines.

Suddenly, it seemed as if the 100 million doses of vaccine that Pfizer has promised to the United States by the end of March would stretch to as much as 120 million — a welcome development given the scarcity of Covid-19 vaccines and the coronavirus pandemic’s mounting death toll.

Pfizer’s accounting for the extra dose is already creating controversy in Europe, where some countries — like Belgium — say they have had to cancel vaccination appointments after discovering that Pfizer is sending them fewer vials. “It’s linked to the sixth dose,” Sabine Stordeur, an official overseeing vaccination efforts in Belgium, told the newspaper Le Soir. “It’s still a private company, so one shouldn’t be surprised.”

The U.S. negotiations come at a particularly harrowing time, as the Biden administration is said to be discussing the purchase of a third round of 100 million doses of Pfizer’s vaccine later in the year. The country is racing to vaccinate as many people as possible before more contagious virus variants become widespread, potentially spurring a wave of new hospitalizations and deaths.

Pfizer’s efforts to capitalize on the discovery were for weeks camouflaged in a bureaucratic language dispute. Before Christmas, Pfizer approached F.D.A. officials requesting a formal change to its fact sheet so that it said each vial contained six doses of vaccine instead of five. But regulators instead suggested the phrase “up to six doses,” depending on what kinds of needles and syringes were used to extract the vaccine.

After the F.D.A. signed a new fact sheet with that more cautious language, Pfizer approached F.D.A. officials again, saying it was crucial to say “six doses.” The company suggested altering the language to indicate that low dead volume syringes should be used. At one point, Pfizer executives lashed out at Dr. Peter Marks, the top vaccine regulator at the F.D.A., according to two people who heard about the exchange but were not authorized to discuss it.

An F.D.A. spokeswoman disputed that characterization of the exchange and said it was “constructive.”

Ms. Rose, the Pfizer spokeswoman, said that “in a situation of limited vaccine supply amidst a public health crisis, our intent with this label change is to provide clarity to health care providers, minimize vaccine wastage, and enable the most efficient use of the vaccine.”

In late December, federal health officials sought to figure out whether there were enough of the specialized syringes to justify the shift. Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said they were uncertain whether the supply was sufficient, according to a person familiar with the conversations.

But federal health officials who manage the government’s contracts for syringes told the F.D.A. that more than 70 percent of the sites were using the more efficient syringes and that more could be easily bought or manufactured, according to another person knowledgeable about the situation.

Still, Pfizer’s attempts to pressure the F.D.A. unsettled some health officials, especially since the company itself originally calculated that the vials contained five doses. If an extra dose could be extracted, that would mean the vaccine supply could be stretched, protecting more Americans from the virus. On the other hand, too few of the specialty syringes would mean the government could end up paying for wasted doses.

By early January, the debate was resolved after a “standard and usual legal review process,” an F.D.A. spokeswoman said. On Jan. 6, in an amendment to the emergency authorization, the F.D.A. formally changed the vaccine’s fact sheet to specify six doses.

“Low dead-volume syringes and/or needles can be used to extract six doses from a single vial,” the new U.S. fact sheet read. It also warned, “If standard syringes and needles are used, there may not be sufficient volume to extract a sixth dose from a single vial.”

In a statement, an F.D.A. spokeswoman said that the agency considered several factors when agreeing to Pfizer’s request, including the availability of the special syringes, the fact that other health authorities had made a similar decision and that the change would vaccinate Americans more rapidly.

Pfizer and the federal government have agreed to track which sites are receiving the syringes and other equipment needed to extract the additional dose, and that the company will not charge the United States for six doses per vial at sites that don’t have that equipment, according to a person familiar with the negotiations who was not authorized to speak because the talks are confidential.

Beginning as soon as next week, the number of Pfizer vaccines that the federal government allocates to each state could be based on the assumption that each vial contains six doses, according to a federal official not authorized to discuss the matter. The C.D.C. and the Department of Health and Human Services were discussing as recently as Friday afternoon when they might make the shift.

Pharmacists around the country are still reporting that they don’t have the right supplies to reliably extract extra doses, said Erin Fox, the senior pharmacy director for drug information and support services at the University of Utah.

She said Pfizer deserved credit for developing the vaccine, but “it isn’t fair to people that can’t access the right syringe and needle combination to be able to get that sixth dose out.”

The contracts for low dead volume syringes are managed by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Agency. A spokeswoman for the agency said the federal government had procured enough of the syringes for the Pfizer vaccine currently available and was working with the company to “track current inventory and future deliveries of these specific syringes for Pfizer and continually comparing them to projected delivery of doses from Pfizer.”

Dr. Fox said that McKesson, the distribution company that has contracted with the federal government to deliver vaccination supplies, is still sending kits that contain only enough supplies for five doses per vial.

A McKesson spokesman said the company began sending out kits that account for the sixth dose this week.

Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said on Thursday that the Biden administration might use the Defense Production Act to accelerate production of the specialized syringes in order to increase supply, suggesting that the federal government is uncertain whether it will have enough in the future.

*Noah Weiland is a reporter in the Washington bureau of The New York Times, covering health care. He was raised in East Lansing, Michigan and graduated from the University of Chicago. @noahweiland

*Katie Thomas covers the business of health care, with a focus on the drug industry. She started at The Times in 2008 as a sports reporter. @katie_thomas

*Sharon LaFraniere is an investigative reporter. She was part of a team that won a Pulitzer Prize in 2018 for national reporting on Donald Trump’s connections with Russia. @SharonLNYT

US hospitals lost $22.3B delaying elective surgeries, study estimates

Alia Paavola

The cost of halting major elective surgery during the pandemic is estimated to be $22.3 billion for U.S. hospitals, according to a new study published in the Annals of Surgery. 

Last spring, many states ordered hospitals to pause elective surgeries to ensure they had staff and capacity to care for an influx of COVID-19 patients. Researchers sought to quantify the financial hit from those cancellations in the U.S. from March 2020 to May 2020. 

For the study, researchers used data from the nationwide inpatient sample to forecast revenue and elective surgery demand. They also conducted a sensitivity analysis to calculate how long it would take to recover the revenue losses.

The researchers found that the median recovery time to recoup lost revenue was 12 to 22 months. They also found that rural and urban nonteaching hospitals may face more financial risk amid the pandemic.

“Strategies to mitigate the predicted revenue loss of $22.3B due to major elective surgery cessation will vary with hospital-specific supply-demand equilibrium. If patient demand is slow to return, hospitals should focus on marketing of services; if hospital capacity is constrained, efficient capacity expansion may be beneficial,” the researchers concluded. 

When will smell, taste come back? 5 COVID-19 questions answered

by Gabrielle Masson 

Temporary loss of smell, known as anosmia, is a commonly reported indicator of COVID-19. 

Losing your sense of smell and taste can be jarring and emotional, and adjusting to the seemingly muted world can be difficult at first. However, research looks promising for COVID-19 patients with anosmia, though scientists say there’s still a lot unknown.

Here’s what we know about anosmia related to COVID-19 thus far:

How does it happen? 

The novel coronavirus likely changes the sense of smell in patients not by directly infecting neurons, but by affecting the function of supporting cells, said Sandeep Robert Datta, MD, PhD, associate professor of neurobiology at Boston-based Harvard Medical School. Dr. Datta co-authored a study published July 31 in Science Advances, and its findings identify the olfactory cell types in the upper nasal cavity as most vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. 

Justin Turner, MD, PhD, associate professor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and medical director of Nashville-based Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s Smell and Taste Center, said May 21 that the primary cause of smell loss appears to be from an inflammatory reaction inside the nose that can lead to a loss of the olfactory neurons.

Who loses their smell?

Smell loss can be one of the first or only signs of disease and may precede symptoms such as cough and fever, Dr. Turner said, citing spring data from VUMC’s Smell and Taste Center.  

A study published Jan. 5 in the Journal of Internal Medicine found that 86 percent of patients with mild COVID-19 cases experienced anosmia, compared with 4 percent to 7 percent of those with moderate to severe cases. The research analyzed data from 2,581 patients in France, Belgium and Italy.  

Will COVID-19 patients get their sense of smell back? 

Of 2,581 COVID-19 patients studied, 95 percent of patients regained their sense of smell within six months, according to the study in the Journal of Internal Medicine.

For most patients, COVID-19 infection is unlikely to permanently damage olfactory neural circuits and lead to persistent anosmia, Dr. Datta said, adding, “Once the infection clears, olfactory neurons don’t appear to need to be replaced or rebuilt from scratch. But we need more data and a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms to confirm this conclusion.”

If so, when do COVID-19 patients get their sense of smell back? 

The average time of olfactory dysfunction reported by patients was 21.6 days, according to the study in the Journal of Internal Medicine. Nearly a quarter of the 2,581 COVID-19 patients studied didn’t regain smell and taste within 60 days of infection.  

Are there any long-term physical or psychological risks?

“If you have a gas leak, you can’t necessarily smell it,” Nina Shapiro, MD, a pediatric head and neck surgeon at University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, told NBC News. “And if people lose their appetites because food tastes like cardboard or even rotting meat, they might develop vitamin deficiencies. What’s more, people might not know when food is, indeed, spoiled or burning.”

“Anosmia seems like a curious phenomenon, but it can be devastating for the small fraction of people in whom it’s persistent,” Dr. Datta said. “It can have serious psychological consequences and could be a major public health problem if we have a growing population with permanent loss of smell.”

Trump administration releases plan to speed up vaccinations

by Ayla Ellison

The Trump administration delivered new guidelines Jan. 12 that expand COVID-19 vaccine eligibility to everyone 65 years old and above.

The Trump administration announced the new guidelines, first reported by Axios, at a press conference Jan. 12 with officials from Operation Warp Speed. 

HHS Secretary Alex Azar said states are being told to immediately expand vaccine eligibility to those 65 and older as well as people under 65 with comorbid conditions. He said vaccine doses will be released based on each state’s pace of administration and the size of their population age 65 and older. 

The new guidelines will also expand the venues where people can get vaccinated and get all available doses distributed now instead of holding back doses for the second shot. 

The new guidelines are similar to steps some states have already taken to accelerate the vaccination process. President-elect Joe Biden said his administration will not hold back COVID-19 vaccine doses and would release those needed for people’s second shots. The president-elect is expected to release more details on the vaccine distribution plan Jan. 14, according to Politico

As of Jan. 11 at 8 a.m. CST, nearly 9 million people had received shots of Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines, according to CNBC. The federal government had initially estimated that 20 million shots would be given by the end of last month. 

HHS Increases and Begins Distributing Over $24 Billion in Phase 3 COVID-19 Provider Relief Funding

December 16, 2020

Today, the Trump Administration, through the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is announcing it has completed review of Phase 3 applications from the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) program and will distribute $24.5 billion to over 70,000 providers. Up from the $20 billion originally planned, the addition of another $4.5 billion in funding is being used to satisfy close to 90 percent of each applicant’s reported lost revenues and net change in expenses caused by the coronavirus pandemic in the first half of 2020. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recognizes this pandemic has upended the health care system and caused significant financial hardships. These resources, along with previous distributions, have provided much needed relief. Payment distribution started today and will continue through January, 2021.

“HHS is providing more than $24 billion in new relief to more than 70,000 healthcare providers, meeting close to 90 percent of the losses they’ve reported from the COVID-19 pandemic in the first half of the year,” said HHS Secretary Alex Azar. “With the Provider Relief Fund, we’ve been able to support providers hardest hit by COVID-19, including safety net hospitals, rural providers, and nursing homes, helping ensure they can continue serving their communities during and beyond the pandemic.”

HHS has designed the PRF program to be agile and responsive to the shifting dynamics of this pandemic. As with other General Distributions, applicants that have not already received a baseline payment of 2 percent of annual revenue from patient care were eligible to do so. Recognizing the ongoing challenges for providers, HHS enhanced the Phase 3 distribution to consider the actual revenue losses and expenses experienced by providers that were attributable to COVID-19. With this opportunity, previously eligible PRF applicants were invited to apply for additional funding, along with first time applicants.

As HHS began analyzing applications, it realized the submissions for lost revenues and net changes in expenses would exceed the $20 billion budgeted for the Phase 3 allocation. In an effort to meet the demand, HHS worked to add another $4 billion to the allocation bringing the new total to over $24 billion. This funding will distribute to providers up to 88 percent of their reported losses. It is worth noting that over 35,000 applicants will not receive an additional payment either because they experienced no change in revenues or net expenses attributable to COVID-19, or because they have already received funds that equal or exceed reimbursement of 88 percent of reported losses.

HHS was pleased to find in its analysis that providers disproportionately impacted by this pandemic applied and will be receiving another infusion of financial relief. Nursing homes for example, will be receiving another $1.10 billion in Phase 3 funding. This builds on the half billon in incentive payments HHS recently announced and the over $15 billion in aggregate funding already distributed. Ambulance, or transportation services providers, will be receiving $1.48 billion in Phase 3 funding.

As the nation celebrates the historic arrival of COVID-19 vaccines, equipping providers with resources to address personal protective equipment needs, expand capacity and explore other responses to combat this pandemic remains an urgent and present priority. The PRF program will continue to support providers in addressing these immediate needs as demonstrated by today’s announcement and through future funding opportunities.

Payments to Phase 3 applicants will begin today and continue as application quality reviews and recipient payment set up are completed before payment can be made. A state-by-state breakdown on the first batch of Phase 3 payments can be found here – PDF. This data will be updated through January as Phase 3 payments are completed. It is important to note this state-by-state data is tied to the state in which a recipient’s IRS Tax Identification Number (TIN) is registered. It is possible recipients render health care services in states other than their listed TIN. After recipients attest to the terms and conditions for funding, they will be listed in the PRF public dataset.

###

27 senators urge inclusion of surprise-billing deal in year-end package

Alia Paavola

Twenty-seven senators are urging Senate leaders to include a measure to ban surprise billing in a year-end government funding package, according to The Hill. 

Democratic and Republican leaders of four committees in the House and Senate reached a deal to end surprise medical billing Dec. 11. 

The committees decided that the best approach would be banning physicians and hospitals from charging patients fees their insurer will not cover and holding patients harmless when they receive emergency care from out-of-network providers. Payment rates would be based on the median amount insurers in a given area pay in-network providers and also allows providers to enter into arbitration to gain higher reimbursements.

But the fate of the bill is undecided because it is unclear whether Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., will agree to include it in the funding package. 

“There will never be a broader bipartisan, bicameral solution to ending surprise medical billing, and we should deal with it now,” the 27 senators wrote to Mr. McConnell and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.,  according to The Hill. “Patients cannot wait any longer.”

The deal reached Dec. 11 has support from unions, insurers and consumer groups. The White House has also expressed support. 

But the American Medical Association and American Hospital Association expressed concerns about the legislation. 

The AMA said it is worried that small physician practices might not be able to receive fair compensation under the arbitration process outlined in the bill. The AHA said it wants to see penalties for health plans that fail to reimburse providers for out-of-network care and clarification that out-of-network providers are responsible for managing their own notice and consent process with patients.

beckershospitalreview.com

Hospital CEOs among first to get COVID-19 vaccine to send public message

Morgan Haefner

In several states, hospital CEOs have been among the first to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Many leaders hope the move will help their communities see the vaccine as safe and increase adoption.

On Dec. 11, the FDA authorized Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine for emergency use in the U.S. At Providence, R.I.-based Care New England, President and CEO James Fanale, MD, was the first in line at the health system for the vaccine on Dec. 15. Dr. Fanale is a practicing geriatrician, and wanted to send a strong public message that the vaccine is safe, according to The Providence Journal.

In Washington, D.C., Anita Jenkins, the CEO of Howard University Hospital, was among the first to be vaccinated in a move she hopes would address doubts that Black Americans may have about the vaccine. Black Americans have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic.

“Healthcare disparities, research, all of that has not necessarily been a smooth ride for Black and brown people in the United States,” Ms. Jenkins told WUSA 9. “That’s why this COVID vaccine is met with skepticism. But let’s please understand, we are losing the battle with COVID. Black and brown people are dying about three times more from this disease than others.”

In addition to being among the first to get the COVID-19 vaccine, hospital CEOs are also using the stories of their front-line workers as a symbol for their communities. Maritza Beniquez, an emergency room nurse at University Hospital in Newark, N.J., was the state’s first person to receive the vaccine, according to ROI-NJ.

University Hospital CEO Shereef Elnahal, MD, said Ms. Beniquez’s, and other healthcare workers’ “adoption of this vaccine will be key to convince community members to vaccinate later. Our healthcare heroes have been, and continue to be, trusted voices for healthcare in our community, and we hope that they will carry the message that these vaccines are safe and effective,” he told ROI-NJ.

beckershospitalreview.com

ACA heads to Supreme Court Nov. 10: 5 things to know

Kelly Gooch

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a case questioning the legality of the ACA on Nov. 10.

Five things to know:

1. At the center of the case is whether the health law should be struck down. In a brief filed June 25 in Texas v. United States, the Trump administration argues the entire ACA is invalid because in December 2017, Congress eliminated the ACA’s tax penalty for failing to purchase health insurance. The administration argues the individual mandate is inseverable from the rest of the law and became unconstitutional when the tax penalty was eliminated; therefore, the entire health law should be struck down.

2. The administration’s brief was filed in support of a group of Republican-led states seeking to undo the ACA. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra is leading a coalition of more Democratic states to defend the ACA before the Supreme Court. 

3. The case goes before the Supreme Court days after media outlets projected Joe Biden as the next president of the U.S. President-elect Biden has said he seeks to expand government-subsidized insurance coverage and wants to the bring back the ACA’s tax penalty for failing to purchase health insurance, according to The Wall Street Journal. If a change regarding the tax penalty did occur, the publication notes that Republicans’ argument on severability would no longer apply.

4. The case also goes before the Supreme Court about two weeks after the Senate voted Oct. 26 to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. Ms. Barrett previously criticized Chief Justice John Roberts’ 2012 opinion sustaining the law’s individual mandate, The New York Times reported, but she said during her confirmation hearings in October that “the issue in the case is this doctrine of severability, and that’s not something that I have ever talked about with respect to the Affordable Care Act.”

5. According to the Journal, the Supreme Court is not expected to make a decision in the case until the end of June.